Recently, a group within our church made a proposal concerning our worship services. The proposal was issued through a letter that did not contain names of the actual people that drafted this proposal, but only indicated two small groups within the church. The proposal has really infuriated some other members of committee’s that received this proposal.
Some things struck me about the proposal:
1. Not once in the proposal was prayer mentioned. Personal preferences were stated…they indicated that they had been “talking.” But not once was it stated that they had been praying about this and felt that God had led them to share this with the appropriate leaders.
2. Not once in the letters were “others” considered. The proposal is simply about making “us” happy. There are no statements regarding the thought that these changes might help us reach people outside the church walls. And, it appears that there is an inability to see any validity to why we do things as is and why we just can’t change and make them happy. After all, isn’t church about making people happy?
3. To my knowledge, no one from this group has approached any of the pastors or appropriate committee leaders regarding their concerns prior to the issuing of their proposal.
4. While reading their proposal, I came to the realization that we need to spend some time communicating and educating our congregation on the differences and purposes of our worship services (what, why, how we do things, etc).
5. In this proposal, it appears as though this group has not taken into consideration that the pastoral and worship leadership may have prayerfully come to the way things are today…instead it’s a “we want this and we see no reason as to why we can’t have it” sort of thing. It’s entirely a “my football, my rules” situation.
6. It appears that this groups ability to praise and to worship through song is conditional. It is basically indicated that they can only sing their hearts out if we sing the songs they want to sing.
7. The church worship survey, which each member of this group was invited to participate in, indicates that the majority of the church prefers contemporary music.
8. We have given people choices. If you prefer to sing hymns and not have a praise team, the 8am service will meet those desires. If you prefer to have more contemporary worship with a praise team, the 10am service is for you. If the time of worship is most important to you it must be understood that this is how we do things. We have given options.
9. Their proposal basically reverts back to the way things were being done when I first arrived at Center Chapel. Both services were exactly the same (minus the children’s moment at 8am). We had two hymns (opening & closing) and a time of praise and worship. Many people complained that our services were too long. Others complained that they only wanted hymns or they only wanted the praise team. So, in order to give people options, we stopped using the praise team at 8am and only sing hymns. And at 10am, we cut out the hymns and work hymns into the praise and worship set on a regular basis (in a contemporary style).
10. What is worship anyway? Jesus teaches us that worship is all about our hearts…that it doesn’t matter the location, the style, the songs…all that matters is our hearts. If we claim that our worship is hindered by the style of music, than we have totally missed the point of what worship is about.
11. It’s interesting how easy it is to point out that the “church is the congregation (the people)” when we want something and how easy it is to brush that off when it comes to serving, praying, giving, etc. And, I think there’s a failure to realize that the church includes that pastors and leaders too…we are also “the people.” And the pastors and leaders are called on to make decisions…look at the 1st church council in the book of Acts…the leaders had to make decisions about Gentiles and whether or not they had to become Jewish in order to follow Christ. In the UMC, we are not a congregational system…we do not take congregational votes to decide. Instead we have committee’s made up of leaders that represent the whole and are responsible for making decisions.
This whole issue has simply pointed out to me how inwardly-focused we are. It has helped me understand why our church is not growing. We aren’t growing because people are only focused on what they want…and could care less about what might bring others into our fellowship. Based on the letter that was sent out before any conversation took place, it appears that many in our congregation have missed the point. The agenda is selfish and about meeting personal felt needs. The church leadership has talked over and over about having an outward-focus. Yet, it appears that some are missing the point and still just looking inward